VNA Saver – PC Software

There is now a variety of PC based software that is available to use with your nanoVNA. In this post, I will be demonstrating NanoVNASaver(version 0.0.9). This is developed by Rune Broberg and is fully open source. Rune originally developed the software as a way to save Touchstone files from the NanoVNA to use in other programs, but couldn’t resist expanding it’s functionality into what is now a fairly complete PC app to run the NanoVNA. If you want to participate in conversations with Rune, He is active on the groups.io nanoVNA group which is an excellent place to find all the latest tips and experimental firmware builds etc. https://groups.io/g/nanovna-users
The software is written is compatible with Windows, Linux and Mac, but I will only show Windows in this guide.

Step 1 – Download and run software(Windows users)

Follow this link to download the latest release of NanoVNA Saver.
vnaSaverDownload
For Windows you can download the pre-compiled .exe file
Once downloaded you can copy the executable to a suitable location on your computer. In m case I just dropped it onto the desktop. When you first run the application Windows will ask if you trust it. CLick the ‘Run anyway’ option and your away. Dead easy!!

Step 2 – Connect to your NanoVNA

If your NanoVNA was connected to your computer via USB before opening the software, the serial port control, may already be populated with the correct serial port number. If not, or if you have multiple serial ports you may need to find the com port number manually. You can fire up Device Manager to see a list of installed com ports.
VNASaver main screen
NanoVNA Saver. Enter the correct com port name into this box. In my case ‘COM4’
In my case the NanoVNA connected as ‘COM4’. Enter this in the serial port box and click ‘Connect to NanoVNA’. Other than the connect button being relabelled ‘Disconnect’ not a lot will happen yet.
Step 3 – Setup your sweep
Most of this is fairly self explanatory. The frequency units are Hz, which is a bit of a pain when typing large numbers.
SweepControl
Sweep Control
My top tip here is to use scientific E-notation.
So for 50KHz you can type 50e3, for 300MHz you can type 300e6. All you need to know is ‘e3’ multiplies you number by 1000 and ‘e6’ multiplies by 1,000,000.
1segment vs 10 segments
Left = 1 segment, Right = 10 segments.
Setting ‘Segments’ to greater than 1 will divide your sweep into a number of smaller 101 sample blocks. This will be at the expense of sweep time, but gets around one of the biggest drawbacks of the standard NanoVNA.
Now click ‘Sweep’ to run the VNA once. Alternatively, check the ‘Continuous sweep’ box to set automatically repeat the sweep.
Step 4 – Calibration
First disable ‘Continuous sweep’ and click the ‘Calibration’ button on the lower left of the GUI. This will bring up the calibration window. It’s worth noting that the calibration here is separate to the internal calibration of the NanoVNA so calibrations in this software will not have an effect on the nanoVNA display.
The basic calibration routine is similar to that outlined in part 1 of this blog series. The only difference is that you need to click sweep on the mainscreen before pressing each Open, Short, Load, Through and Isolation buttons.
vnasaverCAL
Calibration Window
Once all standards have been used, click apply to activate this calibration. You can also click save to store the cal for later use.
It is possible to use non-ideal standards here, so if you do happen to have an expensive cal kit that is provided with all this data, then fill your boots and add this in to get more accurate results. In theory, I could have changed my Load from 50Ω to 51Ω to compensate for my cheap load standard, but I am lazy and when measuring many things it’s not really important.
myCal
My calibration. With Load connected to port 1.

Changing your display.

For my next blog post, I want to measure one of my Ultra-Wideband Spiral Antennas. For this, I am only interested in S11 measurements for the time being, but it would be nice to show SWR also.
Click ‘Display Setup …’
Display setup
Display setup
I will choose VSWR for the lower left plot.
SPI300 S11
HexAndFlex 300MHZ+ Circularly Polarised Spiral Antenna.
Now lets have a quick look at how this compares to a professional grade VNA. I initially tried using the NanoVNA saver to import a Touchstone S2P file from a proffesional grade VNA, but i didn’t trust the results, so I used QUCSstudio to import them both.
QUCSnanoVNAcompare
Using QUCS studio to compare touchstone files
Top Tip – QUCS studio can read your touchstone files and make them part of an electronic simulation. It can also automatically calculate a matching network for any given frequency.
nanoVNAcompare
QUCStudio comparison
This was a quick test and I really didn’t take too much care to isolate the cable from the antenna. At lower frequencies(below the 300MHz design frequency) the cable is not as well isolated from the antenna. To make better measurements of this I would want to add a balun, or some ferrites to the cable to help isolate the DUT(Device Under Test) from the cable.

Conclusion

VNASaver is a great tool. Much better than the basic software that was originally available for the NanoVNA. The author, Rune is regularly updating it with new features and UI improvements. I will need to do further work to fully explore its features, but for now I can highly recommend it.
Tagged with: 
Posted in nanoVNA
21 comments on “Getting Started with the NanoVNA -Part 3 – PC Software
  1. Barry G. Kery says:
    The NanoVNA list the sampling points at 101. Your software, for OSL calibration list it as 1010 sampling points. Is this a typo or by using the software to drive the NanoVNA is does in fact do OSL calibration at one thousand and one sampling points?
    Barry,KU3X
    • hexandflex says:
      Hi Barry, no typo it runs 10 consecutive 101point sweeps so you end up with 1010 rather than the more common 1001. The calibration is calculated and stored in the PC software rather than on the device so its not limited to 101points.
  2. Silvio Barletta says:
    A not gentelman OM of ARI has SIGNED your article WITHOUT TELL YOUR NAME at:http://www.aricuneo.it/AREA%20TECNICA/apparati-misura/Manuale%20in%20italiano%20VNA%20Saver.pdf
  3. Werner E. Juengst says:
    Hello hexandflex,
    I wonder if your software could be extended to provide the option of a log(magnitude) vs. log(frequency) scaling? A further improvement would be the ability to set the scan frequencies at a constant number of points per decade, so that the curves be evenly populated. Can that be achieved with the NanoVNA?
    • hexandflex says:
      Hi, The software is developed by a chap called Rune Broberg not myself. He is normally very open to taking user suggestions and can often be found on the NanoVNA Google group. You can definitely plot log magnitude as that’s the default return loss dB scale. I don’t think the nanoVNA currently supports log frequency sweeps though. Both bits of software are in active development though so the feature may get added at some point.
    • hexandflex says:
      Correction. It’s a Groups.IO group. https://groups.io/g/nanovna-users
  4. azbearhuntr says:
    Awesome series of articles and very helpful. When you state that the cable is not well isolated, especially at 300 and below. Is that the USB cable you’re referring to? Thanks!!
    • hexandflex says:
      No, I was referring to the coax cable. Unless extra care is taken to isolate this(say with ferrites) then it can form part of the antenna. In this case the feed cable and VNA(including USB cable) can form part of the antenna. You can easily check if the coax is ‘hot’ by moving your and across it. If the VNA trace changes dramatically then you have RF currents on the outside of the coax. Any radiation from the cable will change the radiation pattern.
      • azbearhuntr says:
        Thank you so much! Now if you are testing a vehicle antenna and install then maybe it’s beneficial to leave ferrites off the existing coax? Because in my newer ham brain that will always be part of the equation anyway?
      • hexandflex says:
        It depends. But probably you will be ok. But remember the golden rule. “Good SWR does not always equal an efficient antenna”. Depending on frequency you may need to account for cable loss also.
  5. azbearhuntr says:
    Awesome articles! Are you referring to the USB cable when you say the cable isn’t well isolated? Thanks!
  6. jcarter says:
    These are excellent articles. You mention that QUCS Studio can read in touchstone files and ultimately calculate a matching network. Are you aware of a tutorial anywhere that covers that use case? I am using a NanoVNA to look at the feed from a transceiver module to the antenna on a newly designed board. I have what I think is a good s1p file, but I’m having trouble getting that into QUCS Studio and using it to come up with a matching network.
    • hexandflex says:
      I don’t remember it being too difficult. I will try and take a look tomorrow. Did you find the correct component to work as an s-parameter defined component? Can you create an s parameter simulation to generate a smith chart?
      • jhcarter says:
        I have not found the correct component. When I am in the schematic view and click the Insert menu, I see Wire, Wire Label, Insert Equation, Insert Ground, and Insert Port. I’m sure I am overlooking something.
        I have not tried to create an s parameter simulation yet. I will look through the examples provided and see if I can do that.
        I am an embedded software engineer and do a fair amount of digital hardware design as well. I am proficient with KiCAD, but this is my first foray into the RF arena. Thanks for your help.
      • hexandflex says:
        IIRC there is a s-parameter template that will create when you create a new schematic. This creates a generic 2 port simulation. You need to replace one of the ports with an s parameter file input.
  7. jhcarter says:
    OK, I see the template and it works exactly as you say. I have imported the s-parameter file and selected “Export to SnP.” At that point I see a large rectangle appear briefly on the schematic and promptly disappear. I will continue to work with it. Thanks.
  8. jhcarter says:
    Wow!! Your “quick blog” is exactly what I needed. I had made some progress in getting a basic s-parameter simulation running, but this carries me much further and shows me exactly how to do what I need to do. Many thanks.